Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-05 partly_allowed

Viran Gyanlal Rajput vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 3 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

A 13-year-old girl was kidnapped, raped and murdered by the appellant, who was convicted on circumstantial evidence and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction based on strong circumstantial evidence including the victim being last seen with the appellant, recovery of her body and clothing at his instance, matching mud samples, and defensive injuries on the victim. However, the Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum 20-year non-remission period, holding that although the crime was grave and abominable, it did not fall into the 'rarest of rare' category warranting death, given the appellant's young age, lack of criminal antecedents, and possibility of reform."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Sexual Offences Child Protection Sentencing Circumstantial Evidence Death Penalty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login