Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-06 partly_allowed

VUNDAVALLI RATNA MANIKYAM, W/O vs RAMA KRISHNA vs. V.P.P.R.N. PRASADA RAO

Bench: 3 — Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah

In Brief

A dispute arose over an agreement to sell executed in 1981 for Rs. 59,200/-, with the vendor initially to execute a sale deed within four months, later extended to eight months. Before completion, the State initiated land acquisition proceedings, which the vendee successfully challenged and had quashed (1984-1985). The vendee then served notice for execution of the sale deed, which was refused. The trial court dismissed the specific performance suit as barred by limitation under Article 54. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, applying Article 113 of the Limitation Act instead, since the right to sue accrued only upon the notice and refusal. The Court decreed specific performance but modified the consideration to Rs. 15,00,000/-, payable within eight weeks, to reflect the 40-year delay and reach final settlement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation Property Law Specific Performance Land Acquisition Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login