In Brief
This case examined whether an amended contract agreement could supersede and displace an original arbitration clause. The Supreme Court held that when parties mutually agree to amend their contract with clear, unambiguous terms expressly intended to supersede the original arbitration agreement and substitute alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such amendments are valid and enforceable. The Court dismissed the arbitration petition but noted that dismissal does not prevent parties from pursuing other available legal remedies in appropriate proceedings, keeping all other issues open for determination as needed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.