In Brief
Wikimedia Foundation challenged a High Court order requiring it to delete content critical of ongoing legal proceedings. The Supreme Court held that courts must remain open to public debate and criticism, even on pending matters. While contempt can be punished if publications scandalize the court, courts cannot order takedowns merely for discussing proceedings. Robust debate serves democracy; judges cannot respond publicly but must accept criticism within reason. The order to delete pages was disproportionate and void.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.