In Brief

A 14-year-old girl alleged repeated rape and sexual assault by an accused over six months, involving threats with a gun and recording of acts. The trial court rejected bail; the High Court granted it. The Supreme Court cancelled the bail, finding the High Court erred by ignoring the gravity of charges, statutory protections under the POCSO Act, and prima facie evidence from the victim's detailed statement and medical examination. The Court emphasised that in sexual offences against children, child protection supersedes the accused's liberty interests. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.