Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-23 allowed

Yash Vardhan Mall vs Tejash Doshi

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

A widow executed two wills: the first on 1 March 2013 (registered 22 May 2013) naming her husband as executor and the appellant as substitute executor; the second on 22 April 2013 naming her husband as executor and his father as substitute. The widow died on 26 May 2013. After 2.5 years, the appellant sought probate of the first will. The husband then filed for probate of the second will. The appellant filed a caveat. The High Court discharged the caveat, holding the affidavit lacked grounds to doubt the second will's execution. The Supreme Court set aside this order, holding that the affidavit satisfied Rule 25's requirements by stating the appellant's interest as executor of the first (rival) will and the ground that it was the true last will, registered later.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Succession Law Probate Wills Caveat Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login