Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-10-04 dismissed

YATINKUMAR JASUBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Bench: 3 — Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah, B.R. Gavai

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld institutional preference (preference for candidates from the same medical college or university) up to 50% in post-graduate medical course admissions, even after introduction of the NEET examination. The Court rejected petitioners' arguments that NEET—a centralized merit-based examination—made institutional preference impermissible under medical council regulations. The judgment held that NEET changed only how merit is measured (through a uniform test rather than university-specific examinations), not the legal basis for institutional preference. Admissions within state or institutional quota must still be awarded solely based on NEET scores. All petitions were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Education Administrative Law Constitutional Law Reservation Policy Institutional Preference NEET Regulations Higher Education

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login