Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-09 allowed

Yeshwant Gramin Shikshan Sanstha vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Nagpur & Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

A registered society operating 29 grant-in-aided schools employed 16 part-time librarians working 18 hours weekly. The Provident Fund Commissioner demanded contributions under the Central Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The Supreme Court held that as the schools were 100% grant-in-aided and under State control, governed by State provident fund rules, the entire establishment qualified for exemption under Section 16(1)(b) of the Central Act. Since part-time employees doing less than full-time work were ineligible under State rules (which applied to the establishment), the State's exemption covered all employees. The Court set aside recovery proceedings, holding that once an establishment is exempt, Central Act authorities cannot selectively proceed against it for particular employees.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Employees' Provident Funds Labour Law Constitutional Law Administrative Law Educational Institutions Provident Fund Schemes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login