Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-05 partly_allowed

Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Ors. etc vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

In Brief

Candidates with Diplomas in Electrical Engineering applied for posts of Technician-III requiring Matric with ITI qualification. Though initially permitted to take the written test and interview, they were excluded from the final selection list. The High Court Division Bench upheld their exclusion. The Supreme Court dismissed their appeals on the merits, holding that prescribed qualifications are matters of recruitment policy not subject to judicial expansion. However, invoking Article 142, the Court granted the appellants age relaxation of four years for any future post advertised up to 30 November 2020, due to the hardship caused by nearly four years of litigation, even while rejecting their substantive claim."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Recruitment and Selection Administrative Law Judicial Review Qualification Requirements Article 142 Age Relaxation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login