In Brief
Abhinitam Upadhyay sought review of a Supreme Court order dated 05.07.2021 and requested oral hearing in Review Petition No.1353 of 2021 (arising from Special Leave Petition No.849 of 2021). The applicant challenged the earlier order by alleging errors. The Court dismissed the review petition, finding that no error apparent on record was demonstrated. The Court held that review petitions require grounds showing a manifest error to justify interference, and without such grounds, the petition cannot proceed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.