Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-07 allowed

Abhyudaya Kumar Shahi vs Bharat Pradhan Filling Centre

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A company's dealership with Indian Oil Corporation was terminated. The company challenged this in the High Court, arguing an excessive pre-deposit fee was unlawful. The High Court initially sided with the company but later, in contempt proceedings, ordered that the appeal be decided by a panel that had since been abolished under new guidelines. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Court set aside the contempt order as it had lost legal relevance: the appellate forum had been lawfully changed, so the company had no right to insist on the defunct panel hearing it. The appeal was allowed and contempt proceedings closed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Dealership Termination Contempt of Court Appellate Procedure Pre-deposit Requirements

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login