Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-10-18 allowed

Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bangalore vs Ayili Stone Industries Etc. Etc

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Court addressed whether cutting and polishing rough granite blocks into polished stones or tiles creates a distinct taxable commodity. It held that a mere conversion into polished slabs (through cutting and polishing) does not create a new commodity—these remain classified as granite stones under the tax schedule. However, if the process involves creation of actual tiles through multiple processing stages (cutting, slicing, polishing, edge-cutting, buffing), a new and commercially distinct product emerges falling under a separate tax entry. The critical distinction lies in the nature and extent of processing and the commercial identity of the end product. The Court allowed the appeals and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to conduct proper enquiry into the specific process and products involved before determining tax liability.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sales Tax Exemptions Goods Classification Granite stones Manufacture Commercial commodity Central Sales Tax

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login