Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-30 dismissed

Ahmad @ Mohd. Ahmad vs Mohd. Osman

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

Two tenants appealed against eviction orders after courts dismissed their challenge to the landlord's title. The tenants claimed both parties were encroachers on government property, so eviction was invalid. The Supreme Court upheld the eviction. The landlord proved his jural relationship through registered title deeds from 1911–1912, property records, and oral testimony that rent was paid over decades. The tenants provided no evidence of ownership. The landlord established a genuine need for the space for personal use. The Court held that establishing a valid landlord-tenant relationship and proving bona fide requirement for eviction sufficed; merely being encroachers did not prevent eviction.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Eviction Property Law Rent Control Title and Ownership Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login