In Brief
A dispute arose among family members of the Bhargava family regarding agricultural land that belonged to their father. After his death intestate in 1980, some family members sold part of the property to an outsider, triggering lawsuits by a daughter claiming her rightful share and seeking to cancel the sale. When the trial court rejected her request for a temporary injunction, the High Court reversed that decision. The Supreme Court declined to decide the merits of the injunction dispute, instead directing the trial court to decide the underlying land suits on their merits within one year, free from influence by any higher court observations, with the temporary injunction remaining subject to the final outcome."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.