Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-04 partly_allowed

Amar Vivek Aggarwal & Ors vs High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified its earlier judgment on the criteria for designating Senior Advocates. A Senior Advocate sought modification of the marking system for counsel with 10-20 years of practice. The Court held that instead of allocating a fixed ten marks, counsel should receive one mark for each year of practice within the 10-20 year range, reflecting their standing at the Bar. The modification was effective immediately. Other relief sought, including mandating written reasons for secret ballots and publishing cut-off marks, was deferred for further consideration. Related petitions were also listed for hearing.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Senior Advocate Designation Judicial Administration Procedural Fairness Bar Ethics

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login