Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-22 remanded

Indira Jaising vs Supreme Court of India Through Secretary General and Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Indira Jaising filed a writ petition seeking guidelines for designating practicing advocates as Senior Advocates in the Supreme Court under section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Court observed that such guidelines would affect Senior Advocate designation processes across all High Courts and the Supreme Court. Due to the matter's vital importance and need to examine existing guidelines in different High Courts and consult stakeholders, the bench referred the case for hearing by a larger bench constituted by the Chief Justice of India. The designation of Senior Advocates during the interim period remains within the discretion of the High Courts and the Supreme Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Advocates Act Professional Practice Senior Advocate Designation Constitutional Law Judicial Administration

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login