Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-25 allowed

Ambadevi Sanstha & Ors vs Joint Charity Commissioner & Ors

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

Ambadevi Sanstha, a registered public trust, challenged permission granted by the Joint Charity Commissioner to sell its agricultural and residential properties. The newly elected trustees opposed the sale, and higher offers were available, but the Commissioner granted permission at lower rates. The Supreme Court held that a Charity Commissioner must consider the interest, benefit, and protection of the Trust before granting sale permission under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. No equitable interest can be created before obtaining permission. Reserved prices must be fixed after ascertaining market value, and the best available offer must be accepted. The Court allowed the appeal, annulled the sale transactions, and directed restoration of possession to the Trust within two months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Charitable Trusts Public Trusts Law Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 Sale of Trust Property Administrative Law Charity Commissioner Powers Property Protection Fiduciary Duty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login