Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-21 allowed

Cyrus Rustom Patel vs Charity Commissioner Maharashtra, State & Ors

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld a challenge to the Charity Commissioner's sanction for a development-cum-sale of the valuable B.C. Batliwala Agiary (Fire Temple) property in Mumbai's prestigious Malabar Hill area. The temple property was alienated to a developer for Rs. 2,95,00,000 without publishing public notice or ascertaining market value. The Court held that the Charity Commissioner's power under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 requires safeguarding the interest, benefit, and protection of the trust through competitive bidding and market valuation. The transaction was tainted by the trustees' collusion with the developer and deliberate suppression of the need for public notice. The Court set aside both the Charity Commissioner's sanction and the High Court's dismissal, directing the developer to repay the amount and imposing costs on the developer.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Charitable Trusts Public Trusts Alienation of Trust Property Charity Commissioner Powers Trust Law Real Property Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login