Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-03-04 allowed

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd vs Ravindranath Rao Sindhia & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

Amway India appealed a Delhi High Court order appointing a sole arbitrator to resolve a distributorship dispute with Ravindranath Rao Sindhia, a US resident operating a sole proprietorship in India. The High Court held the dispute was domestic arbitration because the business was managed in India. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that when at least one party is a foreign national or habitually resident abroad, the arbitration is 'international commercial arbitration' under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of the Arbitration Act, regardless of where business is conducted. A sole proprietorship has no separate legal identity and is equated with its proprietor; therefore, the proprietor's nationality governs. The Supreme Court ruled the High Court lacked jurisdiction, which vests exclusively with the Supreme Court in international commercial arbitration cases.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Jurisdiction International Commercial Arbitration Sole Proprietorship Appointment of Arbitrator Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login