Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-01-12 partly_allowed

Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala vs State of Gujarat

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This case addresses whether a consensual relationship can defend a charge of kidnapping a minor. The Supreme Court held that a minor cannot legally consent to removal from lawful guardianship, even if they willingly accompany the accused through affection or a consensual affair. The court emphasised that minors' protection under kidnapping laws cannot be undermined by their own purported consent. While the appellant's guilt was established beyond reasonable doubt under IPC sections 363, 366, and 376, the court found the five-year sentence disproportionate given the absence of force, planning, or weapons, and reduced it to time already served, balancing deterrence with fairness.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Rape and Sexual Assault Kidnapping Custody of Minors Sentencing Consent of Minors

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login