Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-26 disposed

Anwar Husena Bammanali vs Uma Mahadevan

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

A selected candidate sought relief after failing to secure appointment due to non-availability of vacancies at the time of his selection under a 2012 notification. When 31 vacancies later became available in the post of Superintendent Grade-I (Probation Officer Grade-I), the Supreme Court directed the Government of Karnataka to appoint him immediately. The Court clarified that seniority would commence from his actual appointment date, not from his original selection, and emphasized that this relief was granted only due to the unusual circumstances of the case and would not constitute a binding precedent for future appointments.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Contempt of Court Public Service Recruitment Procedural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login