Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-12 partly_allowed

Aravali Power Company Pvt. Ltd vs Era Infra Engineering Ltd

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

Aravali Power Company challenged a High Court order that set aside the appointment of its Chief Executive Officer as sole arbitrator in a construction dispute with Era Infra Engineering Ltd. under an agreed arbitration clause. The Supreme Court held that before the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 took effect, an employee arbitrator is not automatically disqualified merely for being employed by one party; disqualification arises only upon 'justifiable apprehension' of bias if the person was the controlling authority over the subject contract or a direct subordinate to the impugned decision-maker. Since the respondent failed to challenge the arbitrator within prescribed time and procedure and had participated in proceedings without objection, the High Court had no jurisdiction to intervene. The Court allowed the appeal and restored the arbitration process.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Law Arbitrator Appointment Independence and Impartiality Arbitration Clause Employee Arbitrator Challenge Procedure Contractual Disputes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login