Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-12 allowed

Aravali Power Company Pvt. Ltd vs Era Infra Engineering Ltd

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

Aravali Power Company appointed its CEO as sole arbitrator in a construction dispute with Era Infra Engineering in August 2015, in accordance with the contract's arbitration clause. Era participated in arbitration proceedings but later challenged the appointment, contending the CEO was an interested party. The High Court set aside the appointment and directed nomination of a neutral panel. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that under the unamended 1996 Act, an employee arbitrator's appointment is valid if no justifiable apprehension of bias exists. Since Era had participated in proceedings without timely objection and there was no evidence of bias or controlling involvement, the appointment was lawful and could not be set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Arbitrator Appointment Independence and Impartiality Scope of Judicial Intervention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login