Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-10-09 allowed

Arun Muthuvel vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, K.V. Viswanathan

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that age restrictions under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 cannot apply retrospectively to couples who began surrogacy treatment before the Act took effect on 25 January 2022. Three couples challenged denial of surrogacy eligibility certificates due to exceeding the Act's age limits (female: 50; male: 55), despite having frozen embryos before the Act's commencement. The Court found that freezing embryos crystallizes a couple's vested right to pursue surrogacy under Article 21. Applying the presumption against retrospective legislation, the bench ruled couples who had completed gamete extraction and embryo freezing before the Act cannot be denied continuation of their procedure. The judgment protects reproductive autonomy while affirming the Act's prospective application to future applicants.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Reproductive Rights Surrogacy Statutory Interpretation Retrospective Legislation Vested Rights Medical Procedure Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login