Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-06 allowed

Avinash Hitech City 2 Society & Ors vs Boddu Manikya Malini & Anr. etc

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Avinash Hitech City 2 Society and others appealed against orders refusing to refer disputes with Boddu Manikya Malini and another to arbitration. The disputes arose from an Addendum to a Supplementary Development Agreement containing an arbitration clause (Clause 19). The respondents had initiated proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act instead. The Supreme Court held that the arbitration clause was binding and the disputes must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court set aside the lower court orders and directed the disputes to arbitration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 8 Arbitration Contract Law Societies Registration

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login