Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-10 dismissed

Babita Badasaria & Ors vs Patna Municipal Corporation & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court rejected a writ petition challenging orders for demolition of an unauthorized multi-storey residential building (Santosha Complex) in Patna that deviated enormously from its sanctioned plan. The building had nine floors instead of six, increased height beyond limits, and violated floor-area-ratio and airport safety guidelines. The petitioners sought to regularize the construction through compounding fees or sealing the illegal mezzanine floor. The Court held that illegal construction cannot be legalized through such measures and that compounding is a closed issue once prior appeals and petitions have been finally dismissed. The Court maintained the demolition order and enhanced compensation to affected flat owners from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 7,000 per sq. ft."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Writ Petition Administrative Law Municipal Law Real Property Construction Regulation Demolition

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login