Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-06 allowed

Balkrishna Dattatraya Galande vs Balkrishna Rambharose Gupta and Another

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

A tenant claimed permanent injunction against his landlord under the Specific Relief Act to restrain disturbance of his alleged possession of commercial premises leased since 1977. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the tenant failed to prove actual possession on the suit date. The First Appellate Court and High Court reversed this, inferring possession from a prior settlement withdrawal order. The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal, holding that actual physical possession on the suit date is mandatory for permanent injunction. The tenant's failure to pay rent for 15 years, lack of business licenses and utilities, and reliance on circumstantial evidence rather than substantive proof of occupation, rendered his claim untenable.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Specific Relief Act Permanent Injunction Tenant and Landlord Property Law Possession Civil Procedure Equity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login