Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-22 allowed

Balkrishna Tukaram Angre vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Balkrishna Tukaram Angre was facing trial for murder under sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on circumstantial evidence. His High Court bail application was rejected. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal, finding that fifteen months of custody with charge sheet already filed justified bail. The Court ordered his release on a bond with two sureties, subject to conditions the trial judge deemed necessary to ensure his court attendance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Bail Murder Common Intention Circumstantial Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login