Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-22 allowed

Balkrishna Tukaram Angre vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Balkrishna Tukaram Angre was charged with murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The High Court rejected his bail application. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal, granting bail because: (1) the entire prosecution case rested on circumstantial evidence; (2) he had been in custody for fifteen months; and (3) the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court found it just and proper to release him on bail with sureties, subject to conditions imposed by the trial court to ensure his attendance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Bail Circumstantial Evidence Preventive Detention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login