Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-09-02 partly_allowed

Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. challenged the conversion of their criminal complaints into private complaints and the issuance of process against them for allegedly forging debit notes. The Court held that Section 195(1)(b) CrPC does not bar complaints alleging offences committed before a document enters court custody. The Court also found that forgery requires the specific intent to make a document appear to be made by another person, which was not established for the debit notes in question. The Court allowed the appeals in part by quashing the private complaints and reinstating the original complaints so they could proceed through proper criminal procedure.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Forgery Document Evidence False Documents Private Complaint Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login