Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-17 dismissed

BANK OF BARODA vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

Bank of Baroda obtained a decree from a London court in 1995 against Vysya Bank and sought to execute it in India in 2009, over 14 years later. The question was whether the execution petition was barred by limitation. The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for executing a foreign decree from a reciprocating country is governed by the law of the country where the decree was passed, not Indian law. Rejecting the traditional view that limitation is merely procedural, the Court determined that when no steps to execute the decree are taken in the cause country within its prescribed period, limitation runs from the decree date; otherwise, execution can be sought in India within 3 years of finalising execution proceedings in the cause country.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation Law Foreign Decrees Conflict of Laws Execution of Decrees International Commercial Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login