Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-03-10 allowed

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. & ANR vs M/S NORTEL NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD

Bench: 2 — Indu Malhotra, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited challenged a High Court order referring a dispute to arbitration. Nortel Networks, after withholdings of amounts (Rs. 99.70 crore) by BSNL for over 5.5 years, invoked arbitration in April 2020—more than 5 years after BSNL rejected its claim in August 2014. The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for applying under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act (three years from accrual of right). Where claims are manifestly time-barred with no subsisting dispute, courts may refuse reference. The notice was time-barred; mere settlement discussions do not extend limitation. The appeals were allowed and the matter was not referred to arbitration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Limitation Procedure Civil Appeal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login