Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-03-10 allowed

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr vs Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Indu Malhotra

In Brief

BSNL withheld Rs. 99.7 crores from Nortel Networks for alleged breach of contract. Nortel claimed the deduction on 13 May 2014; BSNL rejected it on 4 August 2014. Over 5½ years later, on 29 April 2020, Nortel invoked arbitration. The Court held that the limitation period for filing a Section 11 appointment application is 3 years under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, running from failure to appoint the arbitrator. Since the notice was issued 5½ years after rejection with no pleaded facts extending the limitation, it was ex facie time-barred. The Court allowed BSNL's appeal and set aside the High Court's referral, holding that in rare cases where claims are manifestly time-barred and no subsisting dispute exists, courts may refuse arbitration referral.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Limitation Arbitration and Conciliation Act Appointment of Arbitrator Procedural Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login