In Brief
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission challenged lower court orders directing it to accommodate candidates in a merit list without disturbing already-made appointments following a disputed recruitment examination. The Supreme Court found these directions violated settled service law principles. The Court held that unilateral judicial re-evaluation creates complications rather than solutions. Instead of modifying results, the Court set aside the impugned judgments and directed the BSSC to conduct a fresh evaluation and publish results based on expert recommendations and reports, allowing the recruitment authority to address the issues properly.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.