Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-23 allowed

Aarav Jain vs Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath

In Brief

This case involved eight candidates for the 30th Bihar Judicial Services Examination who were rejected by the Bihar Public Service Commission solely for failing to produce original certificates at the time of interview, despite having submitted self-attested copies and producing originals shortly thereafter. All eight candidates had scored higher marks than the last selected candidate in their respective categories. The Patna High Court dismissed their challenges. The Supreme Court allowed their appeals, holding the rejection improper and unjustified. The Court directed that the five candidates in the unreserved category be adjusted against available vacancies, and granted the State discretion to accommodate the three candidates from reserved categories against future vacancies or by borrowing posts. Successful candidates would receive seniority by merit but no back pay for the intervening period."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Civil Service Examination Judicial Recruitment Procedural Fairness

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login