Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-12-20 dismissed

BIJOY KUMAR MONI vs PARESH MANNA & ANR

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

A director of a private company signed and issued a cheque on the company's bank account to discharge his personal debt to the complainant. The cheque was dishonoured for lack of funds. The Trial Court convicted the director under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court quashed the conviction, holding that the director, as an authorized signatory, is not the legal "drawer" of a cheque drawn on the company's account—only the company itself is. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court, establishing that Section 138 applies only to the actual drawer of a cheque. To hold a director vicariously liable under Section 141, the company must first be prosecuted as the principal offender. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Dishonour of Cheque Criminal Law Corporate Liability Vicarious Liability Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login