Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-11 allowed

Bilquis vs State of Maharashtra & Others

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

In this Land Acquisition case, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to reduce compensation for irrigated agricultural land and deny compensation for orange trees. The court found that the High Court overlooked substantial evidence showing the land was predominantly irrigated (85-90%) with perennial water supply via a well, contained 325 orange trees aged 4-5 years that had begun bearing fruit, and supported valuable crop cultivation. The court awarded Rs.1,50,000 per hectare (up from the High Court's Rs.50,000), compensation for orange trees at Rs.600 each (revised from Rs.1,200 based on a ten-year rather than twenty-year multiplier), and additional amounts for barbed fencing and irrigation infrastructure."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Capitalization Method Evidence Assessment Agricultural Land Valuation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login