Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-24 partly_allowed

Board of Control For Cricket vs Cricket Aasociation of Bihar & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified its earlier order on cricket administration, addressing concerns about BCCI's contractual obligations and office-bearer eligibility. The Court affirmed that BCCI must honour all contracts with State Associations regarding international matches. Regarding the 9-year disqualification rule for office bearers, the Court clarified that disqualification operates separately for BCCI and State Association posts—someone barred from a State Association after 9 years' service may still seek BCCI office, and vice versa. Tripartite contracts must be executed before financial benefits accrue, and the Committee of Administrators may consider representations on association eligibility matters."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Sports Administration Contract Law Public Law Interlocutory Applications

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login