Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-12-09 other

Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Bench: 2 — UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN

In Brief

Bombay Dyeing challenged a Central Excise demand for 1981-1985 as barred by limitation in a provisional assessment case. The High Court had directed the Department to issue a Show Cause Notice. Bombay Dyeing argued no express provisional assessment order existed, so no SCN was needed. The Supreme Court held the Department must follow the High Court's directions to issue the SCN. An assessee cannot escape provisional assessment by claiming the lack of an express order; the substance of the matter—that provisional assessment was in effect—binds both parties. The Court emphasized authorities must afford a hearing opportunity as mandated by the High Court."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Law Provisional Assessment Limitation Central Excise Act 1944 Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login