Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-06 dismissed

Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore vs Raymond Ltd. Thr. Its Director

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

The Commissioner of Central Excise challenged a Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal order that declared demand notices time-barred. The Revenue had raised substantial excise demands in the extended five-year period, despite having knowledge of the sales policy and sales agreement since 1997. The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, holding that when materials forming the basis of a demand were known to the Revenue from the outset with no suppression or misstatement, the Revenue cannot rely on the extended limitation period. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Taxation Limitation Administrative Law Appeal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login