Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-31 allowed

Canara Bank Rep. by its Deputy Gen. Manager vs C.S. Shyam & Anr

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A bank employee sought information about the transfer and posting details of all clerical staff across the bank's branches under the Right to Information Act. The bank's information officer refused, citing Section 8(1)(j) (personal information exemption) and absence of public interest. The Central Information Commission and High Court ordered disclosure. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that personal employee information (transfers, postings, career details) is exempt under Section 8(1)(j) and cannot be accessed without demonstrating larger public interest. Since no public interest was shown or examined, the RTI application was properly rejected and the appeal was allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Right to Information Information Access Privacy Exemptions under RTI Act Personal Information Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login