Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-12-11 partly_allowed

Central Bureau of Investigation vs Dayamoy Mahato Etc

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal challenging bail granted by the Calcutta High Court to accused persons in connection with the 2010 Jnaneshwari Express derailment (killed 148, injured 170+). Accused faced charges under IPC, UAPA (terrorism), and Railway Act. The Court held that Section 436-A CrPC (default bail upon prolonged custody) cannot apply to offences attracting death or UAPA charges with reverse burden of proof. While Article 21 protects undertrial liberty, it must balance national security and public safety in heinous crimes. The Court set aside bail orders based on misapplication of Section 436-A and Article 21, but refused interference as accused had not misused bail in three years. It issued directions for expedited day-to-day trial proceedings and monitoring to safeguard speedy trial rights while ensuring justice.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail & Detention Terrorism Unlawful Activities Prevention Act Constitutional Law Right to Speedy Trial Undertrial Prisoners National Security

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login