Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-05-02 dismissed

CHAITRA NAGAMMANAVAR vs STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Chaitra Nagammanavar, who was appointed as an Assistant Professor at Bangalore University. The university had advertised that the mode of selection for this backlog-reserved position would follow the 2001 Special Recruitment Rules, which prefer candidates aged 29-40 years. Although Nagammanavar was more meritorious, she fell outside this age bracket. The respondent, also an ST candidate within the preferred age bracket, challenged her appointment. The Court held that universities must comply with the 2001 Rules when specifically declared in advertisements, and the State Government's repeated directives mandated compliance. Respondent no. 7 was entitled to the appointment. The Court observed that the university should consider a supernumerary post for Nagammanavar due to the university's negligent conduct.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Reservation and Affirmative Action Civil Service Law Higher Education Law Administrative Law Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes University Appointments Special Recruitment Rules Backlog Vacancies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login