Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-26 disposed

Champa Lal vs State of Rajasthan and Ors

Bench: 2 — Chelameswar

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether Rajasthan could upgrade a Gram Panchayat (village council) to Nagar Palika (municipality) status without following Article 243Q(2) of the Constitution. Article 243Q(2) requires the Governor to specify areas as transitional or urban based on multiple factors including population, density, revenue, employment patterns, and economic importance. The State had issued only population-based classifications, ignoring other mandatory factors. The Court held the initial notification unconstitutional and ruled that all subsequent actions derived from it were fundamentally flawed and need not be separately examined. The High Court's decisions were declared per incuriam for failing to examine constitutional requirements.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Municipal Law Urban Development Government Notification Statutory Interpretation Part IXA of Constitution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login