Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-02-07 allowed

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD vs TARSEM LAL

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

The Chandigarh Housing Board advertised houses reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The respondent, a Scheduled Tribe from Rajasthan who had migrated to Chandigarh, was not allotted a house. The trial court and appellate courts decreed his suit, relying on administrative letters suggesting a 5% minimum reservation for Scheduled Tribes. The Supreme Court held that a Presidential notification under Article 342 is constitutionally mandatory to recognize any Scheduled Tribe in a State or Union Territory. Since no such notification exists for Chandigarh, the Housing Board had no authority to invite ST applications, and the respondent cannot claim ST status there based on his Rajasthan recognition. All lower judgments were set aside and the appeal allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Administrative Law Housing and Tenements Reservation Policy Migration and Domicile

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login