Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-12 allowed

CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN vs STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB CID

Bench: 3 — Chief Justice, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Deepak Gupta

In Brief

Two men were convicted of murdering their friend Arun, who died from a drug overdose in a hotel room in 2004. The Supreme Court acquitted them, finding the conviction was based on weak circumstantial evidence. Although Arun died from an overdose of Tidijesic (a narcotic), the prosecution failed to prove the appellants administered the fatal dose. The alleged motive—jealousy over a woman—was never properly established and was introduced only four years after the death. Medical evidence could not determine when the lethal injection was given or who gave it. The Court noted the deceased, a drug user, could have self-administered the final injection. Absent eyewitnesses, recoveries, or proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the Court held the circumstantial evidence was insufficient and acquitted the appellants."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Law Circumstantial Evidence Murder Indian Penal Code Burden of Proof Acquittal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login