Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-12 allowed

Chandru @ Chandrasekaran vs State rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police CB CID and Anr

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

Two appellants were convicted of murdering Arun by administering a fatal drug overdose, based on circumstantial evidence. The deceased, a drug addict, died in a guest house room where the appellants were present. The Supreme Court acquitted them, holding that although the deceased died of drug overdose, the prosecution failed to prove the appellants administered the fatal injections. The medical evidence showed inconsistencies, the alleged motive was unproven, and critically, the deceased—being an experienced drug addict—could have self-injected. The prosecution's circumstantial case broke down as it could not establish an unbroken chain proving the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Law Circumstantial Evidence Murder Drug-Related Offences

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login