Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-10 allowed

Chhotanben and Anr vs Kiritbhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar and Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

Two sisters challenged a 1996 registered sale deed of ancestral agricultural land sold by their brothers without their alleged consent, claiming they only learned of the transaction in 2013 and denying the authenticity of their thumb impressions on the deed. The trial court dismissed the buyers' application to reject the suit as time-barred, holding that limitation was a triable issue. The High Court reversed this, finding the suit barred. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court, holding that when a plaintiff credibly alleges fraud, forgery, and lack of knowledge, the question of which limitation article applies is for trial, not threshold dismissal. The court emphasized that under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, only averments in the plaint matter; defendants' pleas are irrelevant at that stage.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation Property Law Succession & Inheritance Fraud & Misrepresentation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login