Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-31 dismissed

Chilakamarthi Venkateswarlu & Anr vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr

Bench: 2 — Indira Banerjee

In Brief

The appellants sought to quash criminal proceedings for attempt to cause death and injuries, arguing they were falsely implicated as a counter-blast to their own complaint filed three years earlier. The High Court refused to quash the proceedings. The Supreme Court held that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be exercised sparingly and only in rare cases. Since the allegations, prima facie accepted as true, disclosed the necessary ingredients of the offences charged and were supported by statements recorded by the Magistrate, quashing was unwarranted. Questions whether the appellants were falsely implicated or present at the time are factual matters for trial. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Criminal Law Inherent Jurisdiction Quashing of Proceedings Abuse of Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login