Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-15 allowed

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs Stesalit Limited

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The respondent, a railway equipment manufacturer, was found to have manufactured copper coils for captive use without paying duty or submitting required declarations. The adjudicating authority imposed a penalty of Rs.2,06,000/-. The Tribunal partially upheld the duty demand but reduced the penalty to Rs.50,000/-. The Supreme Court held that under Section 11-AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the levy of penalty is mandatory with no discretion to reduce its quantum once made out. The Tribunal acted without legal authority in reducing the penalty amount. The appeal was allowed, the Tribunal's order set aside, and the adjudicating authority's original penalty order was restored."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Law Penalty Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Appellate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login